THE HOLISTIC COSMOLOGY

THE RENEWED HOLISTIC COSMOLOGY

When launching any opposition, a new paradigm or a new hypothesis, there is no need at all to undervalue or ridicule the earlier works and hypotheses of other persons. One must honestly assume that everybody are doing their very best out from their given personal and spiritually circumstances and out from their culturally and scientifically heritage.

- I fully admire any person who are trying to get the grip of things looking at the thing from many perspectives. But in this attempt one can easily fall into several pit holes, especially if ones main education are casting shadows on the other scientific fields one have to use in order to get the whole grip of things.

But let this be said at once: I'm NOT impressed by several hypothesis and theories of the modern science of Astrophysics or Cosmology. Partly because they creates more questions than answers and partly they creates a diversity of anomalies because of the lack of understanding the most obviously and observable natural laws.

And, when not understanding the direct or indirect observable natural laws, the scientists just adds some further speculative equations or mentally installs some "anti"- elements in order to "make the damn thing to react as expected" regarding to some "laws of nature" that NEVER complied from the very moment they first was stated as general cosmological "scientific laws".

New ideas and and a new Cosmological, Natural and Universal explanation are very much needed! So here is my attempt:

THE HOLISTIC RHYTHM OF CREATION

"Gravity" as an orthodox attracting force does NOT exist! Everything is eternal PRESSED forwards in the Universe!

Most of our Universe is a freezing coldness because of the Hydrogen (and Helium9 that fills 99,9 % of the Universe.

This cold Universal basis of Hydrogen and Helium is the very course to the Background Radiation. It could be described as "The Omnipresence Media" in which all heavier matter are being formed, torn apart and reformed etc. etc. This (dark) "Omnipresence Media" of Hydrogen also could be called "Frozen Light"

The rest 0,1 % elements in our Universe are in a CONSTANTLY processing of cluttering and spreading because of constantly cosmic explosions which makes the Molecular Gas- and Dust clouds to Whirl, Clutter, Melt and Explode etc. etc.

Therefore: There are NO beginning and there are NO end! There just are: Eternal In-folding and Out-folding processes on every microcosmically and macrocosmically level.

When an cosmic expansion happens, the expansive movement can only be braked universally again by Molecular Gas- and Dust Clouds, Suns and Planets or other explosive events in Cosmos. It is a Cosmic play of OPPOSITE PRESSURES in a Basic Media of Hydrogen and Helium.

"GRAVITY" = COSMIC PRESSURE AND SWIRLING EFFECTS

1. PRESSURE in our local Solar System concerns firstly the outgoing solar Wind directly, which are causing PRESSURE on all planets accordingly to size, weight and actual position.

2. Interactive orbiting Planets (Stars, Molecular Clouds etc.) causes MORE an LESS PRESSURE via the planetary/moons "Shading Effects" on each other accordingly to their mass and actual position in the orbit around the Sun. This Shading Effect causes minor relative pressure changes all the time in our Solar System.

3. A secondary PRESSURE condition which is in play in our Solar System, is an OPPOSITE PRESSURE from the Milky Way Centre.

WIKIPEDIA:

Radiation Pressure http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure

Solar Sails http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

Solar wind emanating from the sun fills a volume of space around the solar system--called the heliosphere--that interacts with the flow of matter in the interstellar medium. The solar wind is an ionized gas that slows down to subsonic speeds at the termination shock and effectively stops at the heliopause, which defines the edge of the heliosphere.

Charged particles (white lines), mostly hydrogen ions, in the interstellar wind are deflected around the heliosphere’s edge (the heliopause), whereas neutral particles (pink arrow), primarily hydrogen and helium atoms, penetrate the heliosphere. The interstellar wind also "blows" against the solar wind (white lines inside the heliosphere) forcing it to flow with the interstellar wind to form a heliotail.

Since the solar wind changes with the solar cycle, and the interstellar medium is a heterogeneous structure, there is an ever-changing interaction between the heliosphere and its galactic environment. Here the boundaries of the heliospheric features are mapped according to their relative temperatures.

Interstellar helium (pink arrows) that enters the heliosphere is focused by the sun’s gravity to form a helium focusing cone in a direction pointing away from the incoming Local Interstellar Wind. About 10 percent of the neutral interstellar particles are helium atoms. The earth passes through the focusing cone near the end of November every year. (Special Ritual time?)

This explanation concludes that "everything molecular gas and dust are constantly in motion between "swirling centralization and exploding decentralization" in the basic media of Hydrogen (and Helium). This is the basic law of everything!

An important conclusion of the above explanation is: As a modern scientist you either have to have 1 law for 2 opposite and complimentarily forces, or you have to skip the excludingly bad one which creates more questions than answers, namely "the Newton and Einstein anomaly creating gravity laws" you have used for centuries. Their Equations does NOT work and comply - and they NEVER did in the first place!

"GRAVIY" - KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID

Maybe it all is that simple?

1. Electric outbursts creates whirling magnetic fields in micro- and macrocosmos.

2. Whirling magnetic fields fluctuate between polarities.

3. Magnetic plus/plus and minus/minus reject (All kind of "Anti"/matter. Extraction)

4. Magnetic plus/minus contract (All kind of "Newtonian gravity". Contraction

Occam's Razor:

Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor^[1]) is the principle that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem). The popular interpretation of this principle is that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. However, this is often confused, as the 'simple' "is really referring to the theory with the fewest new assumptions."

- And, when rejecting all the bad scientific hypothesis and Equations, I of course have to rise a new relevant Equation for a new and combined Holistic Cosmology, and here it is: (No hypothesis is needed)

GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND MOVEMENTS OF CREATION

The very basics:

Everything is always moving between IN-FOLDING AND OUT-FOLDING

The detailed processes:

Basic Atomaric Principles:

Lighter Elements of Hydrogen and Helium. 99,9 % of the Universe. (The Cosmic Microwave Background)

Secondary Principles:

Heavier Elements 0,1 % of the Universe in locally Molecular Clouds, Galaxies, Stars and Planets etc.

Temperature:

Hot and Cold (X degree plus <–> minus 273 degree)

Movements:

Expansion and Contraction.

Pattern of movement 1:

Accelerating and Decelerating

Patter of movement 2:

Accelerating hot beams meets Gas and Dust matter and creates Swirls.

Pattern of movement 3:

Right - and Left rotating Swirls

Pattern of movement 4:

Vertical Up- or Downwards movements in Swirls.

Specifics of "Gravitation" (i.e:"Forces")

Interactive expansive forces with hot light and matter and breaking fields of Gas and dust and "Pressing and Shading Effects" between nearby objects.

Specifics of Universe:

Light locations:

Exploding or Imploding actions

Darker locations:

Cold "empty space". The space is NOT empty, but full of Hydrogen (and Helium) = "Frozen Light" = "Dark matter".

Galactic specifics:

Bar Galaxies = Outgoing force

Ordinary Galaxies = Ingoing force.

(Different ages of Galaxies)

"Black hole":

The Eye of the Galaxy = Just like a Hurricane. NO Newton or Einstein Gravity here!

"Anti Gravity":

Does NOT exist! When "anti"-results are measured, it's just an "outside" force of PRESSURE! (Explanations below)

THE CREATION OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

Accordingly to Global Mythology, all Creation in our Galaxy has started form the very Center of the Milky Way Galaxy - and I believe this as a fact!

The "ordinary, but alternative, explanation".

Before the creation of our Solar System, there was a cloud of molecular gas and dust. A cosmic ray from a exploding Novae activated the cloud and created 2 swirls in the cloud. The 2 swirls began to clutter the gas and dust. The amount of gas and dust in the 2 swirls was not equally heavy and therefore the lightest swirl got ahead of the heavier cloud in the ongoing process.

Links: http://www.australasianscience.com.au/bi2009/301Gaensler.pdf about cosmic rays/magnetic fields/Faraday Rotation/swirling galaxies.

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_effect

So there was 2 major processes in play before the Solar System was created and therefore we actually have 2 different Systems: 1 System containing much Dust and little Gas, and 1 System containing much Gas and little Dust. The first became the Solar systems inner planets and the second was, in my opinion, created about 1-2 million years before our inner Solar system, around Jupiter (and Saturn?) which is indicated by the many Moons around these 2 major Gas planets.

Planets and some dwarf planets of the Solar System; while the sizes are to scale, the relative distances from the Sun are not. (From Wikipedia)

- Regarding the cluttering process in the 2 swirls, there are NOT any "Newton gravitational" processes going on in the ordinary and dogmatic understanding. It is simply the swirling effect from pressuring Novae waves that swirls and compresses the gas and dust to such a degree, that it heats up, melts and explodes out in 2 directions from the created magnetic poles in the implosion. The cloud did NOT clutter "by it self" accordingly to the totally misunderstood "Newton Law of Gravity concept" or the Einstein theory of Relativity, which both basically is a cosmological non sense.

An outburst from a Quasar causing mushroom swirls in the globular gas. How can a supposedly Black Hole in a Quasar emits anything out of the hole? It's just another Gravity anomaly in the long rows of Gravity anomalies.

- The Sun has its own magnetic sphere that changes and pulses in the Solar sphere, but beside that, the Sun has NO gravitational effects, ordinarily understood. In the contrary, the Solar Wind are PUSHING on the planets and this effect reaches far out in the Solar System. And the same goes for all other planets in our Solar System: They have NO build-in-forces-that-contracts-anything-else-outside! It is a Newton hoax-theory!

The Sun are PUSHING everything outwards until the outgoing force meets other extra Solar opposite forces that BRAKES the the outgoing Solar Wind. And such an opposite force is mainly coming from the centre of our Galaxy, the Milky Way.

The orthodox explanation of "a cosmic disc of molecular cloud suddenly? collapsed" is nonsense! My own and somewhat unusual explanation above. is more likely and more logical but:

The most likely explanation is: That our Solar System was created right out of the Milky Way Centre when a cloud of molecular dust and gas (the premature Milky Way Galaxy Cloud) was activated by some kind of explosion in the "neighborhood", causing a concentrating swirl which, when accelerated and concentrated sufficiently, melted and turned "inside out" casting everything out in a disc-shape formation of Stars, Planets, minor other object and Gas.

The whole movement of Creation is very like the movement in every High- or Low Pressure: "What is going in below, is unfolding above" and visa versa. And there is NO Black hole in the middle.

A mirrored drawing of the movement in a Weather pressure system.

THE MILKY WAY GALAXY

Just like the original swirling creation of our Solar System, the Milky Way Galaxy also is a swirl of gas and dust creation, which once was started of by a major explosion from the surroundings of the molecular cloud, that later on became the Milky Way Galaxy. And just like the forming of swirls in the original Solar gas- and dust cloud, the very same once was/is happening with the original Milky Way gas- and dust cloud.

A newly found galaxy proto-cluster, named LBG-2377.

The photo above clearly illustrates how Swirls in a Molecular Cloud are created by an OUTSIDE FORCE i.e. some kind of Novae explosion in the neighbourhood of the cloud. Notice the 2 opposite directed spirals in the formation, which later on becomes 2 separate Galaxies. Link to the orthodox (don't you believe it) explanation here: http://www.today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1741

But a Galaxy is not "just an everyday Galaxy" with similar qualities and with similar movements. There are younger and older Galaxies. There are left- and right turning Galaxies. There are inwards- and outwards moving Galaxies.

And the inwards- or outwards swirling direction depends on how long the swirling process have been going on in an actual gas- and dust cloud.

This outgoing force from the centre of our Galaxy, indicates very strongly that our Solar System and everything else in our Galaxy have been created right out of the centre of the Milky Way as astronomically observations by telescopes of young Suns right in the middle of our Galaxy indicates. And when you study the many Stories of Creation, the generally confirms "an outgoing direction" as told in the story of Eden/Paradise and the Exile "out of the garden" in which middle the Tree of Life was/is standing, namely in the Centre of our Galaxy from which all Life is created.

Strong little devils, called "Black Holes" should accordingly the "Law of Gravity" be pulling everything in to a hole and tearing everything apart. But both common sense and the Mythological Ancestral Wisdom tells the opposite regarding our Galaxy.

This photo shows a younger Galaxy

Our own Milky Way does not look like the Galaxy above, and it does not have the same directional movement in the horizontal plane. The Galaxy above has diffuse and smooth going arms with clouds of gas and dust moving INWARDS towards the centre of the Galaxy. NOT accordingly to the "Newton Law of Gravity" (Or Einstein's relative Relativity Laws) - but SIMPLY because of the SWIRLING EFFECT that originally took place when the gas- and dust cloud was hit by an external PUSHING or PRESSING forces that began to swirl and compress the gas and dust.

The Old people understood! A Galaxy can have both white and black holes in the Spiral!

The process in this Galaxy above, have not yet been that much compressed, but later on it will explode more or less suddenly. (Or maybe there really are an out-folding process on the opposite side of the Galaxy) Maybe it will be a very violent explosion or maybe it slowly will turn out to be a Globular Cluster of Stars and plasma, it all depends on many facts.

- Our Galaxy have the opposite horizontal movement and it have come further in the process compared to the Galaxy above, and therefore, our Galaxy is older and in another process of cosmological growth.

Our Milky Way Galaxy is a Bar-Galaxy. (Photo and X-ray photo).

The very immediate look of our Galaxy tells us clearly, that the actual movement in our Galaxy is going OUTWARDS. No inwards-going spiral arms in a Galaxy can abruptly take a suddenly 90 degree turn! But they can if we are talking about an out-going movement!

When a galactic cloud of gas and dust have been sufficient compressed by the swirling effect, it melts, explodes and can be spread again in a suddenly burst outwards from the 2 magnetic poles that was created in the melting stage. The 2 jets burst suddenly out while the movement of the original swirl is continuing. The 2 major arms goes right out and leaves the outburst of matter as tales, taking the shape of more and more spiral arms. And the 2 arms of suddenly outburst of matter forms the 2 characteristic Bars from the centre of our Galaxy as clearly seen above.

BLACK HOLES AND WHITE HOLES (My corrections in red font)

Black Hole: A black hole is a theoretical region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, not even electromagnetic radiation (e.g. visible light), can escape its pull after having fallen past its event horizon. The term derives from the fact that the absorption of visible light renders the hole's interior invisible, and indistinguishable from the black space around it.

There is no "pull" and the "gravitational field" is just a swirling result in a molecular cloud being activated, concentrated and heated by some kind of cosmic explosion.

Despite its interior being invisible, a black hole may reveal its presence through an interaction with matter that lies in orbit outside its event horizon. For example, a black hole may be perceived by tracking the movement of a group of stars that orbit its center. Alternatively, one may observe gas (from a nearby star, for instance) that has been drawn into the black hole. The gas spirals inward, heating up to very high temperatures and emitting large amounts of radiation that can be detected from earthbound and earth-orbiting telescopes.^[2]^[3] Such observations have resulted in the general scientific consensus that—barring a breakdown in our understanding of nature—black holes do exist in our universe.^[4]

The idea of an object with gravity strong enough to prevent light from escaping was proposed in 1783 by John Michell,^[5] an amateur British astronomer. In 1795, Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French physicist independently came to the same conclusion.^[6]^[7]

Black holes, as currently understood, are described by the general theory of relativity. This theory predicts that when a large enough amount of mass is present in a sufficiently small region of space, all paths through space are warped inwards towards the center of the volume, preventing all matter and radiation within it from escaping.

While general relativity describes a black hole as a region of empty space with a point-like singularity at the center and an event horizon at the outer edge, the description changes when the effects of quantum mechanics are taken into account. Research on this subject indicates that, rather than holding captured matter forever, black holes may slowly leak a form of thermal energy called Hawking radiation and may well have a finite life.^[8]^[9]^[10] However, the final, correct description of black holes, requiring a theory of quantum gravity, is unknown.

From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

White Hole: In astrophysics, a white hole is the theoretical time reversal of a black hole. While a black hole acts as a vacuum, drawing in any matter that crosses the event horizon, a white hole acts as a source that ejects matter from its event horizon. The sign of the acceleration is invariant under time reversal, so both black and white holes attract matter. The only potential difference between them is in the behavior at the horizon.

Black hole event horizons can only "suck up" matter, while white hole horizons ostensibly recede from any incoming matter at the local speed of light, so that the infalling matter never crosses. The infalling matter is then scattered and reemitted at the death of the white hole, receding to infinity after having come close to the final singular point where the white hole is destroyed. The total proper time until an infalling object encounters the singular endpoint is the same as the proper time to be swallowed by a black hole, so the white hole picture does not say what happens to the infalling matter. Ignoring the classically unpredictable emissions of the white hole, the white hole and black hole are indistinguishable for external observers.

From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole (My corrections in red font)

Cosmic Formation – Collapse or Acceleration?

Space Telescopes Find Trigger Happy Star Formation

http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2009-17/release.shtml

For Release: August 12, 2009

PASADENA, Calif. -- A new study from two of NASA's Great Observatories provides fresh insight into how some stars are born, along with a beautiful new image of a stellar nursery in our Milky Way galaxy.

The research shows that radiation from massive stars may trigger the formation of many more stars than previously thought.

While astronomers have long understood that stars and planets form from the collapse of a cloud of gas, the question of the main causes of this process has remained open.

One option is that the cloud cools, gravity gets the upper hand, and the cloud falls in on itself. The other possibility is that a "trigger" from some external source -- like radiation from a massive star or a shock from a supernova -- initiates the collapse. Some previous studies have noted a combination of triggering mechanisms in effect.

By combining observations of the star-forming cloud Cepheus B from the Chandra X-ray Observatory and the Spitzer Space Telescope, researchers have taken an important step in addressing this question. Cepheus B is a cloud of mainly cool molecular hydrogen located about 2,400 light years from Earth.

There are hundreds of very young stars inside and around the cloud – ranging from a few million years old outside the cloud to less than a million in the interior -- making it an important testing ground for star formation.

"Astronomers have generally believed that it's somewhat rare for stars and planets to be triggered into formation by radiation from massive stars," said Konstantin Getman of Penn State University, University Park, Pa., lead author of the study. "Our new result shows this belief is likely to be wrong."

This particular type of triggered star formation had previously been seen in small populations of a few dozen stars, but the latest result is the first time it has been clearly observed in a rich population of several hundred stars.

While slightly farther away than the famous Orion star-forming region, Cepheus B is at a better orientation for astronomers to observe the triggering process. The Chandra observations allowed the astronomers to pick out young stars within and around Cepheus B. Young stars have turbulent interiors that generate highly active magnetic fields, which, in turn, produce strong and identifiable X-ray signatures.

The Spitzer data revealed whether the young stars have a disk of material (known as "protoplanetary" disks) around them. Since they only exist in very young systems where planets are still forming, the presence of protoplanetary disks -- or lack thereof -- is an indication of the age of a star system.

The new study suggests that star formation in Cepheus B is mainly triggered by radiation from one bright, massive star outside the molecular cloud. According to theoretical models, radiation from this star would drive a compression wave into the cloud-triggering star formation in the interior, while evaporating the cloud's outer layers.

The Chandra-Spitzer analysis revealed slightly older stars outside the cloud, and the youngest stars with the most protoplanetary disks in the cloud interior -- exactly what is predicted from the triggered star formation scenario.

"We essentially see a wave of star and planet formation that is rippling through this cloud," said co-author Eric Feigelson, also of Penn State. "It's clear that we can learn a lot about stellar nurseries by combining data from these two Great Observatories."

A paper describing these results was published in the July 10 issue of the Astrophysical Journal. The team of astronomers that worked with Getman and Feigelson also included Kevin Luhman and Gordon Garmire from Penn State; Aurora Sicilia-Aguilar from Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie in Germany; and Junfeng Wang from Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Mass.

NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls Chandra's science and flightoperations from Cambridge, Mass. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer

Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. The Spitzer observations were taken during the observatory's "cold" mission, before its coolant ran out and it began operating at a warmer temperature.

The new image and information about Spitzer are online at http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/spitzer and http://www.nasa.gov/spitzer

The image and information about Chandra are online at http://chandra.harvard.edu and http://chandra.nasa.gov

New scientific discoveries about the star formation: (And Galaxies)
Trigger-Happy Star Formation
For Release: August 12, 2009

A new study from two of NASA's Great Observatories provides fresh insight into how some stars are born, along with a beautiful new image of a stellar nursery in our Galaxy. The research shows that radiation from massive stars may trigger the formation of many more stars than previously thought.

While astronomers have long understood that stars and planets form from the collapse of a cloud of gas, the question of the main causes of this process has remained open.

One option is that the cloud cools, gravity gets the upper hand, and the cloud falls in on itself. The other possibility is that a "trigger" from some external source -- like radiation from a massive star or a shock from a supernova -- initiates the collapse. Some previous studies have noted a combination of triggering mechanisms in effect.

By combining observations of Cepheus B from the Chandra X-ray Observatory and Spitzer Space Telescope, researchers have taken an important step in addressing this question. Cepheus B is a cloud of mainly cool molecular hydrogen located about 2,400 light years from the Earth. There are hundreds of very young stars inside and around the cloud -- ranging from a few millions years old outside the cloud to less than a million in the interior -- making it an important testing ground for star formation.

"Astronomers have generally believed that it's somewhat rare for stars and planets to be triggered into formation by radiation from massive stars," said Konstantin Getman of Penn State University, and lead author of the study. "Our new result shows this belief is likely to be wrong."

This particular type of triggered star formation had previously been seen in small populations of a few dozen stars, but the latest result is the first time it has been clearly observed in a rich population of several hundred stars.

While slightly farther away than the famous Orion star-forming region, Cepheus B is at a better orientation for astronomers to observe the triggering process. The Chandra observations allowed the astronomers to pick out young stars within and around Cepheus B. Young stars have turbulent interiors that generate highly active magnetic fields, which, in turn, produce strong and identifiable X-ray signatures.

The Spitzer data revealed whether the young stars have a disk of material (known as "protoplanetary" disks) around them. Since they only exist in very young systems where planets are still forming, the presence of protoplanetary disks -- or lack thereof -- is an indication of the age of a star system.

The new study suggests that star formation in Cepheus B is mainly triggered by radiation from one bright, massive star outside the molecular cloud. According to theoretical models, radiation from this star would drive a compression wave into the cloud triggering star formation in the interior, while evaporating the cloud's outer layers. The Chandra-Spitzer analysis revealed slightly older stars outside the cloud while the youngest stars with the most protoplanetary disks congregate in the cloud interior -- exactly what is predicted from the triggered star formation scenario.

"We essentially see a wave of star and planet formation that is rippling through this cloud," said co-author Eric Feigelson, also of Penn State. "Outside the cloud, the stars probably have newly born planets while inside the cloud the planets are still gestating."

Previous observations of Cepheus B had shown a rim of ionized gas around the molecular cloud and facing the massive star. However, the wave of star formation -- an additional crucial feature to identifying the source of the star formation -- had not previously been seen. "We can even clock how quickly this wave is traveling and it's going about 2,000 miles per hour," said Getman.

The star that is the catalyst for the star formation in Cepheus B, is about 20 times as massive as the Sun, or at least five times weightier than any of the other stars in Cepheus B.

The Chandra and Spitzer data also suggest that multiple episodes of star and planet formation have occurred in Cepheus B over millions of years and that most of the material in the cloud has likely already been evaporated or transformed into stars.

"It seems like this nearby cloud has already made most of its stars and its fertility will soon wane," said Feigelson. "It's clear that we can learn a lot about stellar nurseries by combining data from these two Great Observatories."

A paper describing these results was published in the July 10 issue of the Astrophysical Journal. The team of astronomers that worked with Getman and Feigelson also included Kevin Luhman and Gordon Garmire from Penn State, Aurora Sicilia-Aguilar from Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie, and Junfeng Wang from Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls Chandra's science and flight operations from Cambridge, Mass.

More information, including images and other multimedia, can be found at:
http://chandra.harvard.edu and http://chandra.nasa.gov
Media contacts:
Janet Anderson
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala.
256-544-6162
janet.l.anderson@nasa.gov

Whitney Clavin
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-4673
whitney.clavin@jpl.nasa.gov

Megan Watzke
Chandra X-ray Center, Cambridge, Mass.
617-496-7998
mwatzke@cfa.harvard.edu

http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/09_releases/press_081209.html

THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE SOLAR SYSTEM AND MILKY WAY GALAXY

As mentioned above, there is an outgoing force from our Sun PUSHING at everything in the Planetary System. But at the same time there also are an outgoing force from the centre in our Milky Way Galaxy (as well as other extragalactic forces pushing both at our Galaxy and our Solar System) These combined and interactive forces keeps the relative balance in the Solar system while orbiting the Galaxy centre.

But the interaction between these combined forces comes scientifically in to play especially when spaceships leaves our Solar system and begin to meet the extra Solar opposite directed power movement, as described with the Pioneer Anomaly.

A TRIBUTE TO OUR ANCESTORS

The very idea of "swirling patterns" are indeed not new. I'm sure our ancestors had a much greater purpose making swirls in stones and other materials than "just for fun". And I'm even sure they had some spiritual visions of the creative forces in Cosmos. I mean, as I myself was able to have such spiritual Visions some years ago in the middle of the modern hurly burly, what could our ancestors then spiritually have achieved in the quiet Nature?

The entrance of the Ritual Megalithic Newgrange, Ireland

Swirling patterns on a Viking Stone. Bro, Sweden

Spiral patterns on a Bronze Age Shield, Denmark

The Battersea Shield with a lot of Swastika Galaxy symbols.

Our ancestors have many symbols which shows macro- and micro cosmological phenomenon's. For instance the Anglo-Saxon picture to the left above, which shows even the minor swirls around the major hole of a hurricane or a Galaxy. The 2 Asiatic swastika symbols to the right shows a left- and a right turning swirl, just like the low-pressure and high-pressure hurricanes and weather systems. And just like barred arms in a Galaxy.

Link to Natural and Cyclic Ancient Knowledge of Mythology and Cosmology:

http://www.native-science.net

TOP

Education for Mathematicians 1:12