The horizontal movement in the Milky Way Galaxy clearly and surely is going OUTWARDS, there is NO ACTUAL INWARDS forces. That is: "THE NEWTON LAW OF GRAVITY" DOES - ALSO NOT - WORK HERE! And when there is no inwards going forces in our Milky Way, there is NO little strong mysterious dwarf, called "Black Hole", sitting in the Milky Way centre PULLING at anything.

And the same goes for the movement in inwards directed Galaxies: The presumed "Pulling Dwarf" in the centre" is reduced to nothing, because the inwards force is just a simple result of an Nova explosion in the neighborhoods causing heated swirls in the molecular gas- and dust cloud.

The action in the middle are similar to the action in Hurricanes, left- or right-turning; inwards or outwards on the up- or downside; infolding and unfolding.

And with the very same kind of hole in the middle: Empty hole, but strong forces on the inside vortex. Galaxies are just inwards/outwards vortices created by cosmic explosions in cosmic clouds.

"Newly discovered galaxy cluster in early stage of formation is farthest ever identified"

"The galaxy proto-cluster, named LBG-2377 More than 11 billion light years away, galaxies illuminate evolution of universe". See also the Creation of Our Solar System

UC Irvine scientists have discovered a cluster of galaxies in a very early stage of formation that is 11.4 billion light years from Earth – the farthest of its kind ever to be detected. These galaxies are so distant that the universe was in its infancy when their light was emitted.

The galaxy proto-cluster, named LBG-2377, is giving scientists an unprecedented look at galaxy formation and how the universe has evolved. Before this discovery, the farthest known event like this was approximately 9 billion light years away.

“When you observe objects this far away, you are actually seeing the universe as it was a very long time ago,” said Jeff Cooke, a McCue Postdoctoral Fellow in physics and astronomy at UCI and lead author of this study. “It is as if a timeline is just sitting out there in front of you. These galaxies represent what the universe looked like well before the Earth existed.”

Using the Keck Telescope in Hawaii, Cooke detected LBG-2377 while looking for single galaxies. At first, it appeared to be a bright, single object. But after analyzing the wavelengths of its light (galaxies emit light with telltale colors) he discovered it was three galaxies merging together, and likely two additional smaller galaxies.

Scientists use light to look back in time. Because light takes a measurable amount of time to travel, detecting it on Earth today allows scientists to view the source as it was billions of years ago. In the case of LBG-2377, scientists believe the light has been travelling for 11.4 billion years, beginning just a few billion years after the Big Bang when the universe was only 15 percent of its current age. By comparison, the Earth was formed about 4.5 billion years ago.

The process of galaxy formation largely is a mystery. Current theory is that large galaxies formed over time from the interaction and merging of smaller galaxies. This process began more than 12 billion years ago, shortly after the Big Bang. Scientists have observed galaxies merging over a large range of distances and time, providing hard evidence to reinforce the theory. However, using current technology, it is difficult to detect this process at the most extreme distances, when galaxy formation was in its infancy.

Scientists believe galaxy clusters form in a similar manner. As galaxies congregate and interact in large, dense regions of space, the cluster grows with time. Witnessing this process first-hand helps scientists confirm their theory and deepen their understanding of the universe. Galaxy clusters can be detected at extreme distances with current technology because they are bright, but they are difficult to find.

Clusters closer to Earth contain upwards of 1,000 galaxies. Our Milky Way galaxy belongs to a lesser grouping of galaxies called the Local Group, which contains more than 35 galaxies, but only a few bright ones.

“We believe LBG-2377 is a seed that eventually will grow into a massive galaxy cluster,” said James Bullock, director of the Center for Cosmology at UCI and a study co-author.

“Our finding suggests that this is a monster structure being born in a very bright, catastrophic event with a lot of gas and matter collapsing at once,” Bullock said. “We are not just seeing one solitary galaxy. We are seeing a bunch of bright galaxies coming together at the dawn of structure formation in the universe.”

Scientists Elizabeth Barton and Kyle Stewart of UCI, along with Arthur Wolfe of the University of California, San Diego, worked on this study. The research was funded by a Gary McCue Postdoctoral Fellowship and the National Science Foundation.

About the University of California, Irvine: The University of California, Irvine is a top-ranked university dedicated to research, scholarship and community service. Founded in 1965, UCI is among the fastest-growing University of California campuses, with more than 27,000 undergraduate and graduate students, and nearly 2,000 faculty members. The third-largest employer in dynamic Orange County, UCI contributes an annual economic impact of $3.6 billion. For more UCI news, visit www.today.uci.edu.

News Radio: UCI maintains on campus an ISDN line for conducting interviews with its faculty and experts. The use of this line is available free-of-charge to radio news programs/stations who wish to interview UCI faculty and experts. Use of the ISDN line is subject to availability and approval by the university.

Found! Oldest galaxy pile-up

Galaxies gather in growing groups over time, like these two galaxies interacting. Some of these groups merge to form giant galaxies (Source: University of California Irvine)

Related Stories

Astronomers have discovered the most distant galactic collisions yet, a cluster of early galaxies caught merging into one giant galaxy when the universe was just a toddler.

The galactic 'proto-cluster', named LBG-2377, is a whopping 11.4 billion light-years away and in the past.

It provides a window into a time well after the universe inflated and spread matter far and wide.

But it was still a time when all of that matter was coalescing to make the clusters and super-clusters of galaxies that collectively create the cobwebby structure of matter in the modern universe.

The team used the volcano-top Keck Telescope in Hawaii to capture the image of the galaxies in the act of coming together at about two billion years after the Big Bang.

"This particular system showed up as a particularly bright one," says Dr Jeff Cooke, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California at Irvine (UCI).

Cooke and his colleagues publish their discovery in the online astrophysics bulletin astro-ph, accessible via the arXiv website.

To be so bright at such a distance, LBG-2377 must be about 10 times the mass of the Milky Way, say the researchers.

They gleaned the number of galaxies involved in the merger from LBG-2377's spectra of light, which contain multiple galactic signals.

Equally important is the fact that the galaxies have been caught in the act of firing up loads of young stars that are very bright in ultraviolet light.

"It wasn't at all what I expected," Cooke says. "The event is so violent and catastrophic and they are creating so many new stars" that it shines far brighter than any other galaxies or clusters of galaxies at such a distance.

How do galaxy's cluster?

Scientists think all galaxy clusters form in the same way; they gather in growing groups over time and sometimes merge to form giant galaxies.

Watching this happen at all ages of the universe helps to test theories of how the universe evolved.

Galaxy clusters closer to earth can contain more than 1000 galaxies. Our own galaxy belongs to what's called the Local Group, which contains at least 35 galaxies, most of which are very dim.

"We believe LBG-2377 is a seed that eventually will grow into a massive galaxy cluster," says Assistant Professor James Bullock, one of the study's co-authors and the director of the Center for Cosmology at UCI.

Eager to learn more

"It's very rare," says astronomer Alice Shapley, an assistant professor at Princeton University.

"If you look at the spectra of this object and its picture it breaks up into a lot of pieces."

But looking at LBG-2377 in UV and visible light is not telling the whole story, Shapley says.

To properly compare this ancient merger to modern mergers and galaxies, scientists need to study it in other wavelengths.

This way the light of older stars, which don't emit much UV light, can also be accounted for.

"It will be interesting to use the Hubble Space Telescope to look at it," says Shapley.

Oh, dear! I am very sorry to be told by modern cosmologists that Nothingness ruled before the Universe and our Galaxy was created. And the latest modern cosmological theory goes on that the created Universe again will disappear into that Nothingness from where it not was created before Big Bang, according to another Theory. Confused?

Surely there must have been Something before "a big bang" that Created our Universe and our Galaxy!? How can modern cosmological scientists claim and maintain such an idiosyncrasy which really is no better cosmological explanation than in the Biblical statement: "Let there be light"!? And what kind of an cosmological and scientific explanation is such a statement? None!

I know how: Because the scientists mainly are using the intellectual side of their brain and because they have lost the connection to Mother Nature that could have given the scientists the natural wisdom which mirrors all matters "in the Sky as well on the Earth".

- Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have identified the source of a mysterious blue light surrounding a Supermassive black hole in our neighbouring Andromeda Galaxy (M31). Though the light has puzzled astronomers for more than a decade, the new discovery makes the story even more mysterious.

The blue light is coming from a disk of hot, young stars. These stars are whipping around the black hole in much the same way as planets in our solar system are revolving around the Sun. Astronomers are perplexed about how the pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole. In such a hostile environment, the black hole's tidal forces should tear matter apart, making it difficult for gas and dust to collapse and form stars.

Clearly, the scientist again gets it all wrong because of "the Newton Gravity hoax" which are embedded or cemented in their brains. The forming of NEW Stars in the centre of the Andromeda Galaxy clearly indicates and OUT-GOING-EXPANSION and NOT AN IN-GOING-CONTRACTION!

Or an even further more worse scientific cosmic scenario: And in-going force on the one side of the Galaxy - and an out-going force on the other side of the Galaxy. Just as the movement in a Hurricane! How does the "Newton and Einstein law of gravity" comply and compute to such a movement?

And now I'm also looking forward to some answers from these scientologists . . .

NB: Compare this (rotated) photo from EVIDENCE FOR THE SWIRLING CREATION above:

WIKIPEDIA: GRAVITY ANOMALIES AND DISCREPANCIES

There are some observations that are not adequately accounted for, which may point to the need for better theories of gravity or perhaps be explained in other ways. (You can say that again!)

Stars on the outskirts of galaxies are moving faster than they should. Also galaxies within galaxy clusters are moving faster than they should. Dark Matter and MOND have both been proposed as explanations. (Maybe accordingly to the Newton Hoax Law, yes. But NOT accordingly to my explanations above!)

The expansion of the universe seems to be speeding up. Dark Energy has been proposed to explain this. A recent alternative explanation is that the geometry of space is not homogeneous (due to clusters of galaxies) and that when the data is reinterpreted to take this into account, the expansion is not speeding up after all. (Just read above: When an expansion reaches far enough out, it will be braked by other outgoing forces)

The Pioneer spacecraft seem to be slowing down in a way which has yet to be explained. (Just read below!)

Various spacecraft have experienced greater accelerations during slingshot maneuvers than expected. (Because they are under influence of the Solar Wind directed out going power and under the influence of the same outgoing forces form our Galaxy - AND they are under influence of the COMBINED forces from the Sun and our Galaxy some times more and sometime less, all depending in which direction the crafts are moving compared to the Sun and to the direction in the centre of our Galaxy).

An apparent frame dragging effect has been measured by Martin Tajmar and others which exceeds that predicted by General Relativity by many orders of magnitude. (It just clearly shows that neither the Newton Law of Gravity or the Relativity Law of Einstein can explain the most simple an natural cosmological movement and therefore should be rejected and abandoned as soon as possible)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_anomaly

Wikipedia search for "Gravity Anomalies":

http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&q=gravity+anomalies&btnG=Google-s%C3%B8gning&meta=

Further anomalistic statements:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/galaxy_heart_020109.html

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_041115.html

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0131/p02s01-stss.html

http://universe.nasa.gov/press/2002/021107a.html

http://spacespin.org/article.php/chandra_black_hole_swarm

http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/physik_astronomie/bericht-30514.html

http://space.about.com/od/astronomynews/a/milkywaybar.htm

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3847

http://news.sbs.com.au/worldnewsaustralia/astronomers_find_milky_way39s_youngest_supernova_546980

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/blackhole-view-0903.html

http://www.physorg.com/news132504309.html

http://www.astroengine.com/?p=491

http://www.visualastronomy.com/2008/03/spacecraft-experience-orbital-anomalies.html

http://www.topology.org/sci/grav.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2004224.stm

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7854

Redshifts and Microwaves

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/arch10/100421redshifts.htm

Apr 21, 2010

Modern astronomy surely suffers from a kind of blindness. It is either a blindness of mind or one of practice.

The continuing presence of Big Bang cosmology among those who are charged with increasing the store of scientific knowledge proves that there certainly is blindness in some form. Not only astronomers, but science reporters have lost the ability to differentiate fact from theory, thus helping to perpetuate the Big Bang. Media reports constantly assert that new discoveries confirm it when such reports are not based on observational evidence.

On October 3, 2003, the Big Bang theory was falsified by direct observation. The galaxy NGC 7319 was measured to have a redshift of z = 0.0225. It is not uncommon for "nearby" galaxies to have redshifts below z = 1. However, a quasar was located in front of NGC 7319's opaque gas clouds with an observed redshift of z = 2.114.

The two principle tenets of the Big Bang theory are that redshift is proportional to distance and that it is an indicator of velocity. The larger an object's redshift the farther away it is and the faster it is moving away from the observer. Those two ideas provide the backdrop for the commonly held belief that the Universe is expanding.

According to the Big Bang, the NGC 7319 quasar "must be billions of light years farther away than the galaxy" because it has a higher redshift. Yet, since the galaxy is opaque, the quasar has to be in front of the galactic dust clouds and not shining through them.

“No one has found a quasar with such a high redshift, with a redshift of 2.11, so close to the center of an active galaxy,” said the late astronomer Geoffrey Burbidge at the time. The discovery team included his spouse, E. Margaret Burbidge, another noted astronomer. The find was significant because it is the most extreme example of a quasar in front of a galaxy with a lower redshift.

Conventional cosmology relies on an electrically neutral Universe ruled by gravity. Without this dogmatic consensus, the Big Bang would never have become so predominant. Scientists, needing to renew their grants every year, “confirm” the theory when, according to reports, it has been discredited. Magazine publishers desire to maintain good relationships with established institutions, so they accept the latest news releases with little background investigation or critical analysis.

On June 30, 2001, NASA launched the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) on a mission to reexamine some unusual telemetry returned by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite in 1992. Temperature fluctuations data seemed to suggest that there were regions of lower mass density in the Universe. Since the Big Bang theory does not account for such regions—matter and energy should be evenly distributed—the WMAP survey was sent to verify COBE's results.

Electric Universe advocate Wal Thornhill pointed out that neither COBE or WMAP detected "cosmic" radiation. Rather, they both found the natural microwave radiation from "electric current filaments in interstellar plasma local to the Sun. Instead of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), it is the Interstellar Microwave Background. That makes sense of the fact that the CMB is too smooth to account for the lumpiness of galaxies and galactic clusters in the Universe."

The Electric Universe theory has an entirely different way of addressing these matters. It does not rely on unseen and undetectable forces whose existence can only be inferred. Electric currents flowing through ionized gas and dust provide the energy for the stars, presenting themselves in straightforward and understandable ways without resorting to esoteric mathematical models.

Redshifts and microwaves have proven themselves inadequate to explain how the Universe functions.

Stephen Smith

Picture 1 is a star atlas picture of the southern Milky Way contours with an inserted celestial pole and an animated swirl, representing the centre of our Galaxy. Picture 2 from Egypt shows the Mother Goddess in the Sky. Out from her womb rays of matter floats and gives shape to all matter in our Galaxy. Under her head a circle is placed in much the same spot as in the star map picture. How did our ancestors get to know such cosmological facts?

In the Norse Mythology the story of Creation begins with a Ginnungagap, which contains the hole universe. In the northern part, Niflheim, there is coldness and moisture. In south, Muspelheim is warm and glowing. From Muspelheim hot sparks flew out and mingled with the cold and moist then creating the Heavenly Cow which nursed the first giant, Ymer. Myths of Creation

From the Norse and many other mythological storytelling we directly can learn, that life in cosmos is created when warm matter meets cold matter. When warm and cold macrocosmic matter meets, big swirls is formed, just like we know from modern astronomical observations of galaxies. And just like we can se from hurricanes, many Galaxies also have holes in the centre just like "twisters" have. "As above, so it also is down below".

What you can observe in small scale on the Earth, you also can observe in big scale in the Sky. In my opinion it is not necessary to send expensive tin-cans out in the Universe in order to understand cosmos.

Compared with the Mythic way of understanding Cosmos, the modern way is an one way track science in the sense that the scientists mainly are using one side of their brains. In order to complete a whole picture and a whole knowledge, you have to look at everything from at least 2 sides. The one-way-track-mind creates strange theories which very often is directly contradictory and the track prevents the scientists to really understand simple cosmological facts.

The day Newton had nothing else to do but laying under an apple tree, he just should have eaten the falling apple in stead of making brain spin out of the event. That had prevented much of that false knowledge which later on was cemented in the brains of coming cosmological scientists.

Imagine that the Newton apple tree have been so tall that its treetop was placed in the so called "no gravity space" out from the Earth. Then the apple never had fallen to the ground of Earth! But Newton just stated that the Earth is pulling on the apple!

- In a BBC documentary on Comets it is now stated, that Newton did NOT make his Law of Gravity by watching an apple falling, but by watching a comet orbiting the Sun. Well, then Newton should have given it a closer look and asked himself why the Comet tale was pressed out and away from the Sun! Clearly, the Newton law of Gravity is basically a fake! And in the same documentary it is also stated that our Sun produce waves of PRESSURE and that other stars influences on our Solar System by their PRESSURE waves!

This picture of a Comet passing around the Sun, illustrates clearly the outgoing pressure force from the Sun. The picture shows the opposite of the Newton Gravity Theory with the Comet tale radiating AWAY from the Sun in stead of the Comet being PULLED towards the Sun. There is NO pull!

The fact that the Moon is slowly moving further AWAY from the Earth does not confirm Newton's pulling effect, does it? No, another explanation is necessary in order to understand what is going on.

What strong force is able to pull at anything at the same time on the Earth from a central position inside the Earth? It does not seems logical, does it? The longer one moves toward the centre of the Earth, the smaller is the mass which can pull at you! And if you imagine yourself being in the atomic centre of the Earth, there is no more any matter which can pull at anything! The "Newton Law of Gravity " is gaga!

Of course I do not claim that gravity does not exist. I just claim that Gravity is not an effect of pulling forces. At the contrary, Gravity is an effect of combined PUSHING COSMIC FORCES and cosmic movements of the celestial bodies. Such as the Earth rotation, the Solar Wind, the gravity waves in our Galaxy, the shading effect from the Moon on both the Solar wind and on the Galaxy and extragalactic gravity forces.

The planets does NOT PULL at one another! It is NOT the Earth gravitation which PULL us down to the ground! In fact, there is really even no cosmological DOWN or UP!

From our Weather forecast we are familiar with expressions as High- and Low pressure. These terminologies is more precise in order to describe the forces which hold us down on the Earth and other matters concerning micro- and macrocosmic movements.

The Sun creates a outgoing force which is pressing on all the Planets and further out in space. From the centre of our Galaxy there is another outgoing force which also is pressing on the Solar-System. In general, and simplified, it is these 2 forces that holds the Planets in movement and in relative balance in the Solar system. "Gravity" is just 2 opposite forces in this case!

The newest modern cosmological knowledge from 11/23.2004 shows the outgoing force from the Sun meeting the outgoing force from the Galaxy. (Stjernevind/Galaksevind) This picture confirmed my intuitive understanding of gravitational forces in our Solar system and in our Galaxy.

The average Solar- and Galaxy pressure on every person on Earth is approximately 2 pounds pr. square-centimeters. This pressure is of course not constant as with everything else in the Universe. The pressure varies with the rhythm of the Sun, the Moon and with the actual outgoing Galaxy force.

Imagine the outgoing force from the Sun creating a pressure on the Earth. This pressure creates in its own a delayed tide wave around the Earth. When the Moon is positioned between the Earth and the Sun, the pressure will be lesser because the Moon "shades" for the pressure on the Earth.

It is first of all the pressure from the Sun together with the revolving Earth that create the round shape of the Earth and other Planets.

Clearly the Sun is NOT PULLING but PRESSING. And if some planet is positioned between the Sun and another planet this Pressure will be "SHADED" with the result of some lesser pressure on the shaded planet.

And how can one explain the fact that the Moon is moving AWAY from the Earth by 3,8 centimeters every year if the 2 heavenly bodies is pulling at one another with enormous forces? It does not make sense!

We small people on the Earth operates with a very small time-concept which conveniently is connected to the cycle of day and night. But transferring these rules from this small time concept on to macrocosmic matters, we will fail to understand the real matter. The Earthly time concept is Linear and it doesn't work beyond the borders of the Earth. And it even really doesn't work accordingly to the True solar Time!

Strange enough, cosmological scientists observes lots and lots of Galaxies which are moving and seem to infolding an out folding matter - but anyway the scientists still operates with the excludingly linear time concept on the clearly in-folding and out- folding Space. Therefore: "Time" can NOT be connected to Space" The Time/Space concept does NOT work!

The Universe is full of revolving, bending, folding and swirling matters in space". When these matters behave in a non-linear way, we have to change our linear time concept in order to understand the behaviour of these movements.

NOTHING in the Universe moves in linear patterns! So why is it that cosmological scientists is working with linear theories?

Observing many Galaxies, the Astronomers often find a so called "black hole" in the middle of a Galaxy as seen on the 2 pictures above. But picture 1 does not show a Galaxy. It shows a satellite photo of a Hurricane. In the eye of a hurricane there is nothing physically to observe. Most of the modern cosmological scientists can not or will not se the resemblance between "up there" and "down here".

What modern scientists can not se or weigh, it claims something not existing. The hole in a Galaxy then describes then as a "nothingness" which anyway contains a great power, "antimatter".

Looking at the beginning of a Thunderstorm when cold matter meets warm matter, it builds up, folds out, and begins to swirl. The powerful swirling creates the hole in the hurricane and the swirling matter becomes charged around the hole, which have no power in it self.

There is no matter or antimatter in the hole. It is empty for matter but full of power around the hole. A power which can be downwards- or upwards directed and at the same time folding in or out of itself until the hurricane dissolves.

Our ancestors have many symbols which shows macro- and micro cosmological phenomenon's. For instance the Anglo-Saxon picture to the left above, which shows even the minor swirls around the major hole of a hurricane. The 2 Asiatic swastika symbols to the right shows a left- and a right turning swirl, just like the low-pressure and high-pressure hurricanes and weather systems.